Aesthetic Movement

Aesthetic Movement

Aestheticism (also the Aesthetic Movement) is an intellectual and art movement supporting the emphasis of aesthetic values more than social-political themes for literature, fine art, music and other arts. The aestheticism, is an era which lasted from 1890 to 1920 and in beauty (the aesthetic looks) the highest value. Ethics, knowledge, religiousness, social issues are subordinated to and subordinate to the “beautiful” (aesthetic amoralism). Aestheticism also influenced philosophical and scientific aspects, such as the views of Ernst Haeckel or Carl Gustav Carus on the question of the vitality / soulfulness of crystals.

This meant that art from this particular movement focused more on being beautiful rather than having a deeper meaning — “art for art’s sake”. It was particularly prominent in Europe during the late 19th century, supported by notable figures such as Walter Pater and Oscar Wilde, but more contemporary critics are also associated with the movement, such as Harold Bloom, who argued against projecting social and political ideology onto literary works, which he believes has been a growing problem in humanities departments over the 20th century.

In the 19th century, it was related to other movements such as symbolism or decadence represented in France, or decadentismo represented in Italy, and may be considered the British version of the same style.

History
The first aesthetic tendencies emerged in the Renaissance when art emancipated itself from its religious canon and artistic activity detached itself from its medieval connection with monastic work or urban handicrafts. In the 18th century, Immanuel Kant defined ” beauty ” as pleasure without interest.

Modern aestheticism is rooted in romanticism (Friedrich Schlegel, Chateaubriand). Théophile Gautier’s foreword to his novel Mademoiselle de Maupin, written in 1834, is regarded as groundbreaking, in which he recognizes beauty only for the purposeless and describes everything useful as ugly. In 1891, Oscar Wilde’s preface to The Portrait of Dorian Gray became a kind of manifesto of aestheticism. Ludwig Tieck suggested that life be stylized as a work of art. In the 19th century, the term dandy came from English-Scottishwith which aestheticism has since been referred to as a way of life.

From 1885 to 1915 aestheticism influenced impressionism, symbolism and the individual poetologies of absolute poetry. Counter currents were realism, naturalism and in Germany from 1900 onwards neoclassicism.

Representatives of aestheticism are Walter Pater, John Ruskin, Oscar Wilde, Aubrey Beardsley, Frederic Lord Leighton, Stéphane Mallarmé, Stefan George and Gabriele D’Annunzio. Thomas Mann’s story Tristan parodies aestheticism and dandyism.

Aesthetic Literature
The British decadent writers were much influenced by the Oxford professor Walter Pater and his essays published during 1867–68, in which he stated that life had to be lived intensely, with an ideal of beauty. His text Studies in the History of the Renaissance (1873) was very well regarded by art-oriented young men of the late 19th century. Writers of the Decadent movement used the slogan “Art for Art’s Sake” (L’art pour l’art), the origin of which is debated. Some claim that it was invented by the philosopher Victor Cousin, although Angela Leighton in the publication On Form: Poetry, Aestheticism and the Legacy of a Word (2007) notes that the phrase was used by Benjamin Constant as early as 1804. It is generally accepted to have been promoted by Théophile Gautier in France, who interpreted the phrase to suggest that there was not any real association between art and morality.

The artists and writers of Aesthetic style tended to profess that the Arts should provide refined sensuous pleasure, rather than convey moral or sentimental messages. As a consequence, they did not accept John Ruskin, Matthew Arnold, and George MacDonald’s conception of art as something moral or useful, “Art for truth’s sake”. Instead, they believed that Art did not have any didactic purpose; it only needed to be beautiful. The Aesthetes developed a cult of beauty, which they considered the basic factor of art. Life should copy Art, they asserted. They considered nature as crude and lacking in design when compared to art. The main characteristics of the style were: suggestion rather than statement, sensuality, great use of symbols, and synaesthetic/Ideasthetic effects—that is, correspondence between words, colours and music. Music was used to establish mood.

Predecessors of the Aesthetics included John Keats and Percy Bysshe Shelley, and some of the Pre-Raphaelites who themselves were a legacy of the Romantic spirit. There are a few significant continuities between the Pre-Raphaelite philosophy and that of the Aesthetes: Dedication to the idea of ‘Art for Art’s Sake’; admiration of, and constant striving for, beauty; escapism through visual and literary arts; craftsmanship that is both careful and self-conscious; mutual interest in merging the arts of various media. This final idea is promoted in the poem L’Art by Théophile Gautier, who compared the poet to the sculptor and painter. Dante Gabriel Rossetti and Edward Burne-Jones are most strongly associated with Aestheticism. However, their approach to Aestheticism did not share the creed of ‘Art for Art’s Sake’ but rather “a spirited reassertion of those principles of colour, beauty, love, and cleanness that the drab, agitated, discouraging world of the mid-nineteenth century needed so much.” This reassertion of beauty in a drab world also connects to Pre-Raphaelite escapism in art and poetry.

In Britain the best representatives were Oscar Wilde and Algernon Charles Swinburne, both influenced by the French Symbolists, and James McNeill Whistler and Dante Gabriel Rossetti. The style and these poets were satirised by Gilbert and Sullivan’s comic opera Patience and other works, such as F. C. Burnand’s drama The Colonel, and in comic magazines such as Punch, particularly in works by George Du Maurier.

Compton Mackenzie’s novel Sinister Street makes use of the type as a phase through which the protagonist passes as he is influenced by older, decadent individuals. The novels of Evelyn Waugh, who was a young participant of aesthete society at Oxford, describe the aesthetes mostly satirically, but also as a former participant. Some names associated with this assemblage are Robert Byron, Evelyn Waugh, Harold Acton, Nancy Mitford, A.E. Housman and Anthony Powell.

Aesthetic Visual Arts
Artists associated with the Aesthetic style include Simeon Solomon, James McNeill Whistler, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, and Aubrey Beardsley. Although the work of Edward Burne-Jones was exhibited at the Grosvenor Gallery which promoted the movement, it also contains narrative and conveys moral or sentimental messages hence it falls outside the given definition.

Aesthetic Movement Decorative Arts
According to Christopher Dresser, the primary element of Decorative Art is utility. The maxim “art for art’s sake,” identifying art or beauty as the primary element in other branches of the Aesthetic Movement, especially fine art, cannot apply in this context. That is, Decorative art must first have utility, but may also be beautiful. However, according to Michael Shindler, the decorative art branch of the Aesthetic Movement, was less the utilitarian cousin of Aestheticism’s main ‘pure’ branch, and more the very means by which aesthetes exercised their fundamental aesthetic strategy. Like contemporary art, Shindler writes that aestheticism was born of “the conundrum of constituting one’s life in relation to an exterior work” and that it “attempted to overcome” this problem “by subsuming artists within their work in the hope of yielding—more than mere objects—lives which could be living artworks.” Thus, “beautiful things became the sensuous set pieces of a drama in which artists were not like their forebears a sort of crew of anonymous stagehands, but stars. Consequently, aesthetes made idols of portraits, prayers of poems, altars of writing desks, chapels of dining rooms, and fallen angels of their fellow men.”

Important elements of the Aesthetic Movement have been identified as Reform and Eastern Art. The Government Schools of Design were founded from 1837 onwards in order to improve the design of British goods. Following the Great Exhibition of 1851 efforts were intensified and Oriental objects purchased for the schools teaching collections. Owen Jones, architect and Orientalist was requested to set out key principles of design and these became not only the basis of the schools teaching but also the propositions which preface The Grammar of Ornament (1856), which is still regarded as the finest systematic study or practical sourcebook of historic world ornament.

Jones identified the need for a new and modern style that would meet the requirements of the modern world, rather than the continual re-cycling of historic styles, but saw no reason to reject the lessons of the past. Christopher Dresser, a student and later Professor at the school worked with Owen Jones on The Grammar of Ornament, as well as on the 1863 decoration of The Oriental Courts (Chinese, Japanese, and Indian) at the South Kensington Museum, advanced the search for a new style with his two publications The Art of Decorative Design 1862, and Principles of Design 1873.

Production of Aesthetic style furniture was limited to approximately the late 19th century. Aesthetic style furniture is characterized by several common themes:

Ebonized wood with gilt highlights.
Far Eastern influence.
Prominent use of nature, especially flowers, birds, ginkgo leaves, and peacock feathers.
Blue and white on porcelain and other fine china.

Ebonized furniture means that the wood is painted or stained to a black ebony finish. The furniture is sometimes completely ebony-colored. More often however, there is gilding added to the carved surfaces of the feathers or stylized flowers that adorn the furniture.

As aesthetic movement decor was similar to the corresponding writing style in that it was about sensuality and nature, nature themes often appear on the furniture. A typical aesthetic feature is the gilded carved flower, or the stylized peacock feather. Colored paintings of birds or flowers are often seen. Non-ebonized aesthetic movement furniture may have realistic-looking three-dimensional-like renditions of birds or flowers carved into the wood.

Contrasting with the ebonized-gilt furniture is use of blue and white for porcelain and china. Similar themes of peacock feathers and nature would be used in blue and white tones on dinnerware and other crockery. The blue and white design was also popular on square porcelain tiles. It is reported that Oscar Wilde used aesthetic decorations during his youth. This aspect of the movement was also satirised by Punch magazine and in Patience.

In 1882 Oscar Wilde visited Canada, where he toured the town of Woodstock, Ontario and gave a lecture on May 29 titled “The House Beautiful”. This particular lecture featured the early Aesthetic art movement, also known as the “Ornamental Aesthetic” art style, where local flora and fauna were celebrated as beautiful and textured, layered ceilings were popular. An example of this can be seen in Annandale National Historic Site, located in Tillsonburg, Ontario, Canada. The house was built in 1880 and decorated by Mary Ann Tillson, who happened to attend Oscar Wilde’s lecture in Woodstock, and was influenced by it. Since the Aesthetic art movement was only prevalent from about 1880 until about 1890, there are not many surviving examples of this particular style but one such example is 18 Stafford Terrace, London, which provides an insight into how the middle classes interpreted the principles of Aesthetics. Olana, the home of Frederic Edwin Church in upstate New York, is an important example of exoticism in Aesthetic movement decorative arts.

nitiation and development of the movement
At the end of the 19th century, a new sensitivity developed in reaction to naturalism. This new movement was fundamentally interested in describing reality even in its triviality.

As for the esthetes or estheticians, they preferred to dedicate themselves to the search and investigation of refinement, beauty, and art. They strongly adhered to the religion of the beautiful, and found it in the unexplored forms of the “vulgar” and the “simple”: primitive art (pre-Raphaelite) or naive art, for example, ancient furniture and clothing were reintegrated into the arts decorative by William Morris, and esoteric forms of language, etc., were reused. Let us remember for example “All art is completely useless” (from the preface to the workDorian Gray’s portrait). Among the literary writings that explore at almost the same moment the possibilities of this philosophy are:

Against the grain (1884) of Joris-Karl Huysmans.
The portrait of Dorian Gray (1890) by Oscar Wilde.
Hedda Gabler (1891) by Henrik Ibsen

The reception was enthusiastic for the three works in small circles, coteries, and literary magazines.

For quite some time, Théophile Gautier and the art for art movement had prepared the way for this change (preface to the work Mademoiselle de Maupin, 1835), and will be the nucleus from which the so-called Art nouveau will be developed..

Aestheticism, decadentism, read symbolism, are the solutions that are sought to escape the same malaise: “the end of the 19th century” forks between, on the one hand, faith in science and modernity, and on the other On the other hand, pessimism against the values contested due to materialism. And the cult of beauty in itself has thus seemed to many a way out. There is some interest in evading or dispensing with everyday reality, discrediting and contesting bourgeois morals and customs.

Likewise, contrary to the aspects currently highlighted in the definitions of aestheticism or aestheticism, it will be noted that this current implies a deep philosophical reflection, which is not superficial at all. For true esthetes (or estheticians), being superficial and simplistic is almost like being criminal, since it is not only convenient to achieve beauty externally, but also and simultaneously must go in search of balance and inner beauty. ” Beauty ” must be complete, imposing itself as a ” lifestyle ” and as a “precept to apply.”

Decadent British writers were greatly influenced by Walter Pater and his writings, as well as by the novel Mario the Epicurean, in which it was established that life should be lived intensely, primarily following beauty as an ideal. These approaches, along with research on the Renaissance, became the bible of young art enthusiasts in those years. James McNeill Whistler, Oscar Wilde, and Stéphane Mallarmé fueled the stream’s refinement pattern, with delicate sensitivity perhaps, to its highest point.

In 1891 Walter Pater published a series of essays (Appreciations) that led him to be considered one of the highest representatives of aestheticism, whose most dazzling and exquisite aspects were revealed both in his work and in his life. Her extensive poem Ravenna won the prestigious Newdigate Prize in 1878, and turned the bohemian style of English youth into a philosophy of life, which was seriously enunciated by Oscar Wilde, who is also one of the most representative in aestheticism.

The movement came to an end with the trial of Oscar Wilde in 1895.

Aestheticism, symbolism, decadentism, dandyism
These movements have been analyzed and discussed a lot, in the sense of establishing whether there is any kind of opposition between some of them, and naturally, among specialists the positions are divided. In this section, therefore, no definitive result is expected.

Certainly aestheticism primarily advocates ” art for art ‘s sake ‘, while the Decadence is ” the antithesis of the poetic movement of the Parnassians and its doctrine (inspired by the classic ideal of “art for art”) .